<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Anay Kamat's Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anaykamat.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anaykamat.com</link>
	<description>Technology, Programming, Career, Fun, Friends And Thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 02:12:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Just Released: Maya Programming Language by Dan Cook</title>
		<link>http://anaykamat.com/2010/08/25/just-released-maya-programming-language/comment-page-1/#comment-76522</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 02:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anaykamat.com/?p=123#comment-76522</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been working on &quot;the best&quot; language I can come up with for an embedded system since 2009 (arguably since 2004), and I am bent on not using compiler tools because I feel they result in less-than-optimal code, and prevent one from actually WRITING a compiler. I found this to side with me:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3314834/what-compiler-tools-are-used-by-official-language-developers

I&#039;ve analyzed many languages and features to pick the best combination for full computational power (including polymorphism on objects) without a lot of overhead. I&#039;d be interested to see what you&#039;ve come up with, and perhaps you&#039;d be interested to see what I am working on: http://tinyurl.com/z80opia

Feel free to email me if you want to discuss this further; and props to you for delving into compiler theory! (You are right, they do not teach people to do this; and when they do, they say to just use tools...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been working on &#8220;the best&#8221; language I can come up with for an embedded system since 2009 (arguably since 2004), and I am bent on not using compiler tools because I feel they result in less-than-optimal code, and prevent one from actually WRITING a compiler. I found this to side with me:</p>
<p><a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3314834/what-compiler-tools-are-used-by-official-language-developers" rel="nofollow">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3314834/what-compiler-tools-are-used-by-official-language-developers</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve analyzed many languages and features to pick the best combination for full computational power (including polymorphism on objects) without a lot of overhead. I&#8217;d be interested to see what you&#8217;ve come up with, and perhaps you&#8217;d be interested to see what I am working on: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/z80opia" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/z80opia</a></p>
<p>Feel free to email me if you want to discuss this further; and props to you for delving into compiler theory! (You are right, they do not teach people to do this; and when they do, they say to just use tools&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to learn computer programming? by V3King</title>
		<link>http://anaykamat.com/2007/10/13/how-to-learn-computer-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-76439</link>
		<dc:creator>V3King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anaykamat.com/2007/10/13/how-to-learn-computer-programming/#comment-76439</guid>
		<description>Amazing Post Bro... I Always Love To Read Your Posts... Keep It Up Bro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing Post Bro&#8230; I Always Love To Read Your Posts&#8230; Keep It Up Bro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Binding HTML Form Fields To Javascript Objects by kiran</title>
		<link>http://anaykamat.com/2008/05/22/binding-html-form-fields-to-javascript-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-73821</link>
		<dc:creator>kiran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anaykamat.com/?p=50#comment-73821</guid>
		<description>it is not working fine.... i checked it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is not working fine&#8230;. i checked it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Binding HTML Form Fields To Javascript Objects by kiran</title>
		<link>http://anaykamat.com/2008/05/22/binding-html-form-fields-to-javascript-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-73820</link>
		<dc:creator>kiran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anaykamat.com/?p=50#comment-73820</guid>
		<description>it is not working fine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is not working fine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Simple equivalent of &#8220;With&#8221; statement in C# by Ken Baltrinic</title>
		<link>http://anaykamat.com/2009/08/09/simple-equivalent-of-with-statement-in-c-sharp/comment-page-1/#comment-48162</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Baltrinic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 21:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anaykamat.com/?p=84#comment-48162</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea.  I wrote a [blog](http://blog.baltrinic.com/software-development/dotnet/c-equivalent-for-visual-basic-with-statement) some time back that took a similar approach but didn&#039;t use reflection.  I like your syntax better but people might find mine a little simpler and possible faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea.  I wrote a [blog](http://blog.baltrinic.com/software-development/dotnet/c-equivalent-for-visual-basic-with-statement) some time back that took a similar approach but didn&#8217;t use reflection.  I like your syntax better but people might find mine a little simpler and possible faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Make free calls from your mobile phone (Even without sim card) by Anay</title>
		<link>http://anaykamat.com/2007/12/24/make-free-calls-from-your-mobile-phone-even-without-sim-card/comment-page-1/#comment-20807</link>
		<dc:creator>Anay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 06:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anaykamat.com/2007/12/24/make-free-calls-from-your-mobile-phone-even-without-sim-card/#comment-20807</guid>
		<description>Fring is a mobile phone application. It&#039;s not a sim card. It&#039;s not associated with any mobile phone providers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fring is a mobile phone application. It&#8217;s not a sim card. It&#8217;s not associated with any mobile phone providers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RSpec Matchers: Be careful while testing boolean values by David Chelimsky</title>
		<link>http://anaykamat.com/2010/05/30/rspec-matchers-be-careful-while-testing-boolean-values/comment-page-1/#comment-20074</link>
		<dc:creator>David Chelimsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anaykamat.com/?p=105#comment-20074</guid>
		<description>There was an interesting discussion about this just last week at RubyConf in New Orleans. Not so much about RSpec, about Ruby predicates (i.e. methods that end with &#039;?&#039;) and &quot;truthiness.&quot; Essentially, nearly all of the time, we write code like this:

  if some_predicate?
    do_something
  end

In that example, do_something would be executed if some_predicate? returned any value other than nil or false, so there is no reason to ensure that it is true or false, just that it is &quot;truthy&quot; or &quot;falsy&quot; :)

That is the reason that RSpec&#039;s be_true and be_false work as they do and unless you have a very good reason to check the explicit value rather than its meaning in the context of the expression, you should probably just use the matchers as they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was an interesting discussion about this just last week at RubyConf in New Orleans. Not so much about RSpec, about Ruby predicates (i.e. methods that end with &#8216;?&#8217;) and &#8220;truthiness.&#8221; Essentially, nearly all of the time, we write code like this:</p>
<p>  if some_predicate?<br />
    do_something<br />
  end</p>
<p>In that example, do_something would be executed if some_predicate? returned any value other than nil or false, so there is no reason to ensure that it is true or false, just that it is &#8220;truthy&#8221; or &#8220;falsy&#8221; <img src='http://anaykamat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>That is the reason that RSpec&#8217;s be_true and be_false work as they do and unless you have a very good reason to check the explicit value rather than its meaning in the context of the expression, you should probably just use the matchers as they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Make free calls from your mobile phone (Even without sim card) by Joshua</title>
		<link>http://anaykamat.com/2007/12/24/make-free-calls-from-your-mobile-phone-even-without-sim-card/comment-page-1/#comment-17240</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anaykamat.com/2007/12/24/make-free-calls-from-your-mobile-phone-even-without-sim-card/#comment-17240</guid>
		<description>:?: Does fring work like a sim card, do you need to buy it and where will i get some to buy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://anaykamat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_question.gif' alt=':?:' class='wp-smiley' />  Does fring work like a sim card, do you need to buy it and where will i get some to buy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fring with Airtel GPRS by Anay</title>
		<link>http://anaykamat.com/2007/12/30/fring-with-airtel-gprs/comment-page-1/#comment-16144</link>
		<dc:creator>Anay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anaykamat.com/2007/12/30/fring-with-airtel-gprs/#comment-16144</guid>
		<description>As of now, I am having Nokia E71. And I must say, I am completely satisfied with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of now, I am having Nokia E71. And I must say, I am completely satisfied with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fring with Airtel GPRS by Ronny Rimm</title>
		<link>http://anaykamat.com/2007/12/30/fring-with-airtel-gprs/comment-page-1/#comment-16089</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronny Rimm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 06:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anaykamat.com/2007/12/30/fring-with-airtel-gprs/#comment-16089</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m having a slight problem right here. I would like to purchase myself a good cell and can&#039;t make up my mind on which phone to select. To begin with, i am considering the Nokia N97, which my friend has. It looks pretty tough, and all seemed cool, but  i started looking at other phones. Now my largest problem is deciding between the Nokia E71 and the Samsung B3310. All advice is welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having a slight problem right here. I would like to purchase myself a good cell and can&#8217;t make up my mind on which phone to select. To begin with, i am considering the Nokia N97, which my friend has. It looks pretty tough, and all seemed cool, but  i started looking at other phones. Now my largest problem is deciding between the Nokia E71 and the Samsung B3310. All advice is welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

